Christian Socialist Movement > Articles > Articles from CSM Members > Faith and Politics > Faith and Class Politics
   
 Articles in this group 
CSM As Ambassadors For Christ
Graham reflects on CSM's role as citizens of heaven More ...
A Youth Perspective on the proposal to change our name from CSM to Christians on the Left ~ A New Na
A youth perspective on the name change More ...
Please vote for this option: not co-option
Ian writes on the name change ahead of the AGM. More ...
Faith And Young Labour
CSM member Simon Darvill talks about his recent election as National Chair of Young Labour More ...
It's a wonderful life
Faith in Politics?
Should Preaching Confront Capitalism?
From Rhetoric to Reality
At Its Best When At Its Broadest
God and Politics - Transformed to transform
Theos talks about religious rhetoric in politics
Between Plato And Aristotle
CSM Stories 'Why I am a Christian and on the Left'  
An address by ArchBishop of Southwark Peter Smith celebrating CSM's 50 year legacy  
Advent Reflection - Week 4 - Liberation
Advent Reflections - Week 3 - Humility
Advent reflection – week 2 – Equality
Advent reflection - week 1 - Prophecy
Religion and Patriotism
Faith and Party Politics: Responding to Three Criticisms
50 years of CSM
Tuitio Fidei et Obsequium Pauperum - In defence of the Archbishop
Christian Socialist Movement - 50 years on
POLITICS AND CHRISTIANITY - A CSM VOLUNTEER SPEAKS
Labour as a radical tradition
What are the top six reasons Christians don't get involved in politics?
The History of CSM
Christianity and Politics: A Member Reflects
Government's Record on Christianity and Faith
The Politics of Integrity
Is Loyalty a Virtue?
Recapturing a sense of what is the Common Good.
Why it’s not enough just to vote
Ten Things Labour has done for Christian Communities
Why politics ?
Faith Matters
Taking the Next Step
Breaking the Mould: Politics for the next generation.
Fighting the Norwich North by-election
Does religion have a role to play in British politics?
Why I Joined CSM
Politics and theology: Something to say
Good to Great: What do we expect of CSM ?
The Post Secular Age
 
 
 

Faith and Class Politics


This is an article written by ex-paramilitary and peace campaigner Billy Mitchell. He died in 2007. Many in Northern Ireland are starting to discover that there could be a future beyond sectarian politics.



Pure religion and undefiled before our God and Father is this, to visit the fatherless

and widows in their affliction, and to keep oneself unspotted from the world. 

James 1:27
 

A common charge levelled against loyalists like myself is that we have abandoned the faith

of our Protestant heritage and sold out to secular socialism. Those of us who profess faith in Jesus Christ are especially targeted for our alleged apostasy.  

 

The belief within certain sections of the Protestant-Unionist community that Christianity

and class politics are mutually exclusive has fuelled the bitter antagonism which religious

fundamentalists have towards Christians whose politics are left-of-centre. The fear that any

interaction between Christians and socialists must lead to a dilution of the faith is

completely irrational and displays a clear lack of faith and a lack of confidence on the part

of the fearful.  
 

While Christianity and Marxism are philosophically irreconcilable I believe that Jesus and

Marx, as individuals, shared many common ideals. If it were possible, I believe listening to

a dialogue between Jesus and Marx would prove to be very informative and most

enlightening for Christians and Marxists alike.

 

Both Jesus and Karl Marx had a passion for transforming social structures. Both wished to

empower those who were excluded from the power structures of their societies. Both

sought to enrich and enhance the quality of human life for the disadvantaged and the

dispossessed. Both were outraged at the social and economic inequalities that forced people

in their days to live in poverty and oppression. Both had a deep and abiding sympathy for

the deprived, the disadvantaged and the dispossessed. While they would clearly have

expressed irreconcilable differences with regards to philosophy and theology, they would

have found much in common to talk about and, more importantly, to act upon. I believe too

that both would openly disassociate themselves from much of what has been said and done

in their names.
 

Jesus would certainly have disassociated Himself from the religious wars, the inquisitions

and the persecutions that have been carried out in His name. I would like to think that Karl

Marx would disassociate himself from the purges, the Gulags and the suppression of human rights that have been carried out in the name of socialism.

 

The Bible abundantly testifies that there is a special place in the heart of God for the poor.

Indeed when Jesus commenced His earthly ministry He used the following statement to

outline the focus of His mission: -"The Spirit of the Lord is on me, because he has anointed

me to preach good news to the poor. He has sent me to proclaim freedom for the prisoners

and recovery of sight for the blind, to release the oppressed (Luke 4.18). The church has

often attempted to spiritualise the words of Jesus as if to say that He referred only to

spiritual bondage, spiritual oppression and spiritual blindness. However, as the Christian

historian, Timothy L. Smith, points out: - “The poor are not oppressed simply by their sins but by an exploitative society. To face up to social wrong - unfair wages, desperate housing conditions, the reign of ignorance and deference to the idols of race or class or nationalism is the obligation of every Christian”. As Keir Hardie, one of the early Christian Socialists,  once declared “Christ’s great work was… to remove the causes which divided man from man, to make it impossible for the strong to oppress the weak or the rich to rob the poor”.

 

In his book, Religion and Revolution, the Marxist revolutionary Fidel Castro said, “the

church should take the lead in responding to the widow, the orphan, the hungry and the

needy.” Notwithstanding the differences in belief and ideology that exists between Castro

and Jesus, I would suggest that no genuine follower of Jesus could disagree with his

statement. Indeed if we set Castro’s comments alongside those of the Apostle James (James

1.27) we will see that they are both singing from the same hymn-sheet.  Jon Sobrino, the Latin American Liberation Theologian, has identified two classes of “the poor” for whom Jesus the Liberator had a soft spot. The first class was the economic poor – the hungry, the poorly clothed, the badly housed, the sick and the infirm. The second class included the social outcasts of his day – women, prisoners, prostitutes, winebibbers, lepers,  strangers, and the one who was different.

 

Looking back on my childhood days our family certainly fell into the first category. My

own experience of life was one of watching my young widowed mother struggle to feed,

clothe, house us and nurse us through the many sicknesses that came with poverty. For our

family, life was a struggle to obtain the basic necessities of life and to ward off the attention

of the moneylenders, the tick men and the host of other parasites who fed on the misery of

the poor.  
 

It wasn’t until I went to prison, and fell into the second of Sobrino’s categories, that I had

time for both personal reflection and interaction with others from a similar background. In

Long Kesh we explored issues that we took for granted on the outside.

 

Even in prison we did not attempt a scientific analysis of our experiences. I have never

exhaustively read Karl Marx but I have read and experienced Other Marks - the marks of

pain furrowed across the brow of my widowed mother who was at her wits end because her

money and her food had run out, the marks of pain on the faces of at least a dozen

neighbours or friends who died before their time as a result of industry induced cancers, the

marks of shame on the face of a school friend who felt that the only marketable commodity

left to sell was her own body. These marks spoke volumes. 

 

Doctrinaire socialists may well be correct in producing their scientific analyses of the

causes of poverty and deprivation. My analysis, flawed as it might be in terms of doctrine

and theory, is the product of personal experience. I have been there, I have experienced it

and I am entitled to wear the tee-shirt.

 

I know too, from personal experience, that there is more to human well-being than material

things. There is a spiritual dimension to human existence that needs to be nurtured as much

as the physical. For me, a living relationship with the Risen Christ meets that need.

 

Tony Benn who has described himself as a “Christian without God” and who was brought

up in a Christian home, acknowledges that the moral roots of his socialism lie in religion.

In his “Arguments for Democracy”, Benn follows Keir Hardie and George Lansbury in

acknowledging that his “political commitment owes much more to the teachings of

Jesus…than to the writings of Marx whose analysis seems to lack an understanding of the

deeper needs of humanity”.
 

Jesus fully understands those deeper needs of humanity. Thus, a socialism that is informed

by the spiritual passion of Jesus ministers to the whole person.

 

I see no contradiction in being a follower of Jesus Christ while, at the same time, seeking

the social, political and economic emancipation of either the economic poor or the social

outcasts. On the contrary, I believe with Jon Sobrino that that is exactly what Jesus Himself

would seek to do. 
 

Thus, I am neither ashamed of my faith in Jesus Christ or of my commitment to class

politics.        

Billy Mitchell
 

Billy Mitchell, 14/12/2010